Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Cancer ; 2015 Dec; 52(7)Suppl_3: s158-s163
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-176761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and the soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21‑1) are supposed to have a prognostic role in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after surgery, but it has not been used as an adjunct to the tumor‑node‑metastasis (TNM) staging system to provide therapy options for patients with pathological Stage I NSCLC. This study was designed to investigate the effect of serum levels of CEA and CYFRA 21‑1 before and after surgery on the prognosis of patients with Stage I NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed regarding the medical records and follow‑ups of 169 patients with Stage I NSCLC before and after surgery. The patients were divided into three groups based on levels of serum CEA and CYFRA 21‑1 before and after surgery: (1) continuously normal‑level groups (CEA [NN] and CYFRA 21‑1 [NN] groups); (2) declined to normal‑level groups (CEA [HN] and CYFRA 21‑1 [HN] groups); and (3) continuously high‑level groups (CEA [HH] and CYFRA 21‑1 [HH] groups). Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan–Meier method for each group. The Chi‑square or Fisher exact test was employed to compare clinical and pathologic factors at the level of P < 0.05. The prognostic factor was evaluated by the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Compared with the continuously normal‑level groups, the CEA [HN] group was significantly correlated to tumor size (P = 0.011), and the CYFRA 21‑1 [HN] group was significantly correlated to tumor type and pathological TNM in addition to tumor size. Five‑year survivals were significantly lower (P = 0.004) in the CEA [HH] group (67.3%) and the CEA [HN] group (86.5%) than in the CEA [NN] group (85.7%) and were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the CYFRA 21‑1 [HH] group (47.2%) and the CYFRA 21‑1 [HN] group (70.1%) than in the CYFRA 21‑1 [NN] group (90.1%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor size (21–50 mm), CEA [HH], and CYFRA 21‑1 [HH] were independent unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), whereas tumor size (21–50 mm), CEA [HH], CYFRA 21‑1 [HN], and CYFRA 21‑1 [HH] were independent significant prognostic factors for progression‑free survival (PFS). CONCLUSION: Patients with a persistently high serum CEA or CYFRA 21‑1 before and after surgery had shortest OS and PFS. These patients had worst prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy was likely to improve survival for these patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL